Clinical insight · Implant prosthetics
Ti-base vs custom abutment: what changes on the Rx
Screw-retained crown on a titanium base or cemented crown on a custom abutment: survival, soft tissue, Ti-base height and what to put on the lab Rx.
Short answer
A Ti-base crown is bonded to a titanium base outside the mouth and screwed onto the implant, so no cement reaches the sulcus. A custom abutment is designed for the site and takes a cemented crown, with the margin wherever you want it. In a 2023 review of 857 single-unit prostheses, Ti-base restorations had 98.6% one-year survival.
How is a Ti-base different from a custom abutment?
A Ti-base (titanium base) is a prefabricated component: the implant connection at the bottom and a short post on top that the ceramic is bonded to. A custom abutment is designed in CAD for that one implant, with the emergence profile and margin set for the site, and milled either in titanium or as zirconia bonded to a Ti-base.
What matters on the Rx is how many pieces go into the mouth and where the cement sits. The 2013 ITI consensus describes both ways of building a screw-retained restoration: the abutment can be separate from the crown (two-piece) or joined to it during fabrication (one-piece). A Ti-base crown, often called a hybrid abutment crown, is the one-piece option; a custom abutment with a cemented crown is the two-piece one.
| option | how it’s made | how it’s retained | where the cement is | what the evidence shows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screw-retained crown on a Ti-base | zirconia or lithium disilicate crown bonded to the Ti-base outside the mouth | screwed through the crown’s access hole | at the crown–base joint, done outside the mouth | 98.6% one-year survival across 857 prostheses (Chantler, 2023); estimated 10-year survival of 93.5% to 95.9% in 601 posterior crowns (Graf, 2024) |
| Custom zirconia abutment on a Ti-base, with a cemented crown | zirconia mesostructure bonded to the Ti-base; the crown is a separate piece | abutment screwed in, crown cemented on it | at the margin you prescribe | counted with other Ti-base restorations (Chantler, 2023); no long-term data of its own |
| Custom titanium abutment, with a cemented crown | one-piece abutment milled in titanium | abutment screwed in, crown cemented on it | at the margin you prescribe | soft tissue matched stock abutments at 12 months (Lops, 2023) |
| Stock abutment, with a cemented crown | the system’s prefabricated abutment, prepped or not | abutment screwed in, crown cemented on it | wherever the stock abutment puts the margin | soft tissue matched custom abutments at 12 months (Lops, 2023) |
Clinical follow-up is still short. Mean follow-up in the Chantler review was 31 months, and the longest dataset, Graf’s, is retrospective. Which of the four fits the case is your call.
Does a Ti-base crown last as long as a cemented crown?
On the data available, a screw-retained Ti-base crown survives as well as the alternatives, at least in the short and medium term. In the systematic review by Chantler and colleagues (Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2023), 857 single-unit prostheses on Ti-bases had 98.6% survival at one year. A meta-analysis of six randomized trials in the same review found no difference in survival from other abutment types.
Zhang and colleagues (Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2024) looked only at one-piece hybrid abutment crowns. Across 20 studies, one-year survival was 100%, with no difference from cemented crowns where the two were compared head to head, and the estimated incidence of complications stayed under 1%.
The longest follow-up comes from a retrospective study. Graf and colleagues (Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2024) followed 601 posterior screw-retained crowns on Ti-bases for 3 to 12.9 years. Estimated 10-year survival was 93.5% for monolithic lithium disilicate and 95.9% for veneered zirconia, which had more complications. Taller crowns had lower survival.
Does a Ti-base affect bone and soft tissue around the implant?
A Ti-base made very little difference to bone, and a custom abutment made no measurable difference to soft tissue, in the trials that looked. Liu, Chiam and Wang (International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2024) pooled six randomized trials with 274 implants. Ti-base restorations showed 0.088 mm more marginal bone loss than one-piece abutments, with no difference in probing depth, bleeding on probing or prosthetic complications. The authors call the evidence insufficient.
On soft tissue, Lops and colleagues (Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2023) compared CAD/CAM and prefabricated abutments in the esthetic zone across six studies and 230 implants. At 12 months, midfacial recession, papilla fill and pink esthetic score did not differ. So the reason to go custom is the geometry of the site: where the margin has to sit, where the access hole comes out and how much contour the tissue needs.
When does a custom abutment make more sense than a Ti-base?
A custom abutment with a cemented crown makes sense when the screw access would come out through a visible surface or the margin has to sit at a height the Ti-base can’t reach. It also fits when you want an intact occlusal surface. Those are the situations in which the 2013 ITI consensus recommends cement retention, with margins at or above the tissue and with real care at cementation.
For an implant angled toward the facial there is a third route: an angled screw channel, which keeps the crown screw-retained. The meta-analysis by Atieh and colleagues (Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2025) pooled four studies and 167 non-molar crowns. Outcomes were comparable to cemented crowns, with less bleeding on probing. Follow-up is still short, and the option depends on the implant system offering the component.
Residual cement and margin depth are covered, with the numbers, in screw- vs cement-retained implant crowns.
Does Ti-base height matter?
Ti-base height matters for the crown bonded to it. Ntovas and colleagues (Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2024) reviewed the lab studies on cementing CAD/CAM restorations to Ti-bases, and base height was the factor that weighed most on retention. Air abrasion helped on bases at least 3.5 mm tall without micro-retentive features, and the authors call for a validated bonding protocol.
Ti-bases come in different cuff and post heights depending on the system. If the mucosa is thick or the space to the opposing arch is short, say so on the Rx. Those two measurements drive the choice of base and the base-to-crown proportion, and in Graf’s study taller crowns did worse.
What should go on the lab Rx?
The Rx needs to say which design you want and give us what the scan can’t show. Include:
- screw-retained crown on a Ti-base, custom abutment with a cemented crown, or stock abutment with a cemented crown;
- implant brand, system and platform, plus the make and model of the scan body you used;
- the cuff height you want, or the tissue thickness if you measured it;
- for a cemented crown, where you want the margin relative to the mucosa;
- if the access comes out on the facial, what to do: cement on an abutment, or use an angled channel if the system has one.
At Smile Digital Lab, our implant components are Neodent and Titaniumfix, both made in Brazil. At check-in we confirm the component for your case is in stock before it moves on, and if you place a different system, that conversation happens before you send. Our zirconia implant crown page shows how the crown is made. Why implant crowns get remade explains what a wrong platform on the Rx costs, and the intraoral scanning guide shows how to capture the scan body.
Related services
Open a portal accountFrequently asked questions
Is a Ti-base crown screw-retained or cemented?
Both, at different stages. The crown is cemented to the Ti-base outside the mouth, and the assembly is screwed onto the implant. That keeps cement out of the sulcus, and the crown comes off through the access hole when it needs maintenance.
Do custom abutments give better soft tissue than stock abutments?
Not in the studies published so far. A 2023 meta-analysis of 230 implants in the esthetic zone found no difference in midfacial recession, papilla fill or pink esthetic score at 12 months between CAD/CAM and prefabricated abutments. The authors advise deciding case by case.
Does a Ti-base cause more bone loss around the implant?
Very little, as far as it has been measured. In a 2024 meta-analysis of six randomized trials and 274 implants, Ti-base restorations showed 0.088 mm more marginal bone loss than one-piece abutments, with no difference in bleeding, probing depth or prosthetic complications. The authors rate the evidence as insufficient.
Which implant components do you work with?
Our implant components are Neodent and Titaniumfix, both made in Brazil. Put the implant brand, system and platform on the Rx. If you place a different system, talk to us before you send the case so we can confirm the component.
Sources
- Clinical performance of single implant prostheses restored using titanium base abutments — a systematic review and meta-analysis · Clinical Oral Implants Research (Chantler et al., 2023)
- Clinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration — a systematic review and meta-analysis · Journal of Prosthodontic Research (Zhang et al., 2024)
- Clinical performance and risk factors of all-ceramic screw-retained implant crowns in the posterior region based on a retrospective investigation · Clinical Oral Implants Research (Graf et al., 2024)
- Influence of Ti-base-supported implant restoration on peri-implant conditions — a systematic review and meta-analysis · The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants (Liu, Chiam and Wang, 2024)
- CAD/CAM abutments in the esthetic zone — a systematic review and meta-analysis of soft tissue stability · Journal of Clinical Medicine (Lops et al., 2023)
- In vitro assessment of cementation of CAD/CAM fabricated prostheses over titanium bases — a systematic review · Clinical Oral Implants Research (Ntovas et al., 2024)
- Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained implant-supported fixed reconstructions (consensus statement) · ITI Academy (5th ITI Consensus Conference, 2013)
- Angled screw channel-retained vs. cement-retained implant crowns in nonmolar sites — a systematic review and meta-analysis · Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (Atieh et al., 2025)
One technical letter a month
Materials, protocols and what we see at the bench. No promotions, and you can leave anytime.